This week’s blog post on “Empowering
Education: Education is Politics” by Ira Shor is a Connections post. I found
this article a tough read so I will be using different resources to help me
make my connections.
I believe Shor’s main
point in this article is that a teacher’s curriculum needs
to be more than taking notes and memorization. These things can harm a child’s
development and learning ability.
“People are naturally curious. They are born learners. Education can either develop or stifle their inclination to ask why and to learn. A curriculum that avoids questioning school and society is not, as is commonly supposed, politically neutral. It cuts off the students’ development as critical thinkers about their world. If the students’ task is to memorize rules and existing knowledge, without questioning the subject matter, or the learning process, their potential for critical thought and action will be restricted.” (pg 12)
“People begin life as motivated learners, not as passive beings. Children naturally join the world around them. They learn by interacting, by experimenting, and by using play to internalize the meaning of words and experiences.” (pg 17)
These quotes reminded me a
great deal of Kliewer’s article “Citizenship in School: Reconceptualizing Down
Syndrome.” Children learn in many different ways. As future teachers we will
need to incorporate our curriculum to fit the needs of every child. Take the
example of Shayne’s classroom and her student Isaac. I loved reading about this
classroom and the ideas Shayne had! It was such an inspiration to me. Shayne
incorporated a curriculum that fit Isaac’s needs. Instead of verbally
communicating his interpretation of a book, he danced it out. This caused the
other students to “learn by interacting, by
experimenting, and by using play to internalize the meaning of words and
experiences.”
Shor also discusses that we need to break the stereotypes
of teachers. This coincides with Christensen’s article “Unlearning the Myths
that Bind Us.” The media loves to play on different stereotypes-especially in a
school setting. Christensen tells us that the media influences us in major
ways. Even in college I find myself using stereotypes to describe professors. I’m
sure all of us have used www.ratemyprofessor.com
to look up our professors. I have looked up a professor, saw the bad reviews,
and walked into the classroom worried. Of course, the majority of the time, the
professor turned out to be the complete opposite of the reviews left by other
students.
I found this video and thought it helps add onto my
Christensen connection. The video shows how the media uses stereotypes for
teachers and the students’ reactions to the teachers and their homework. I hope
you enjoy the video as much as I did. (I mainly loved it because I could
remember growing up with these cartoons-gotta love the 90’s!)
Points
to Share with the Class:
I could personally relate our FNED 346 class to
this article. I love Dr. Bogad’s teaching technique. Instead of making us
memorize vocabulary words She allows us to learn in our own way. While we read
our weekly readings we write our articles in our own way-a way that reflects
our individual learning techniques. I have learned so much in these past weeks
in our class than any other class-mainly because I am not under pressure to
memorize!
